Archive for June, 2010

Gardella, 05

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

W. Greenhouse Gardella on his decision to not study intellectual property law in law school

“I think I was a small ant with high hopes. I think I I imagined that the field was at a more progressive place and that it would be less depressing to represent freedom of information and freedom of access. I thought it would be less depressing. If I’m going to work in a field that will cause me to despair, I at least want to have clients that have more serious and tangible problems. That sounds awful, but… There’s some combination of there’s no hope for it right now and there are more urgent human needs that I can get involved with. I guess I assumed that ideas like copyleft and defensive patent litigation, which is where, among other things, you’ll try in advance to have someone else’s patents invalidated before they actually sue you for infringement. That’s something that IBM has done on behalf of the FLOSS community at times. I thought that the legal community at large was more aware of the sort of deep human significance of these things than it turned out to be. And I thought they had more of a constituency than they turned out to have…I could have become the only FLOSSie IP lawyer to graduate from the University of Pittsburgh that year and Pitt is a kind of prestigious IP school. I don’t feel not guilty about it. I feel deeply guilty about it. In fact it’s one of those things that I think that in some alternative hypothetical world I could have done, but I just don’t have the chutzpah to keep at it. The policy side of it fascinates me. The law that implements that policy is horrible. What I mean by that is that the effects are important and I’m deeply passionate about them, but it’s hard to be intellectually engaged and reading thousands of pages and doing other things lawyers do when you hate everything you’re reading and thinking about. Every time I thought [this is stupid]. And the other thing is that the most essential ability of a lawyer, besides just research, is the ability to put yourself in the adversary’s position and think about what would make sense to them. This helps with both settlement and avoiding conflict in the first place and also with responding to arguments. And my scorn for patent lawyers is so enormous that I wouldn’t have been effective at that. There’s a difference between not liking an area of law and thinking an area of law shouldn’t exist.”

Mako, 01

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Mako has a story about how he and Rob met.

Mako was riding the T. Rob recognized him from a video he was editing. He went up to Mako and told him he knew who he was. Mako, as is his wont, invited Rob over for dinner. Mako was recognized. Normally, this happens in relation to his name, rather than his face. However, Rob had been working on a video. He had seen Mako rather extensively.

After all, Mako has fairly unique vocal patterns. Cutting video with him in it takes a lot of work.

Rob has a story about how he and Mako met.

One time at the grocery co-op, Rob and his girlfriend were standing in line. Mako was ahead of them. Rob pointed this out. “To show off,” he told me.

Some time later, on the train, Rob saw Mako again. His girlfriend encouraged him to go say hello and introduce himself. Rob was resistant to this but relented.

Mako invited him over for dinner.

“You know how Mako is,” Rob said.

I asked him if he would have talked to Mako on his own, had it not been for the push. He admitted that he wouldn’t have.

Celebrity

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

“See that guy? In the shorts? That’s Ron Newman,” Mako tells me this with his excited voice. It’s the voice he uses when he’s sharing something that isn’t really a secret–he just makes you feel like it is. He sounds a bit like Kermit the Frog when he talks in his excited voice. But, instead of sharing the weather or introducing tonight’s guest, he says something about someone, or something, that lets you feel a little bit like you’re being let into a secret club of being in the know.

I had had no clue who Ron Newman is. Mako explains to me that Ron Newman was a developer of the X Window System. This vaguely means something to me. I know X Window System, or X (and later X11), was an early graphical user interface.

In the mid 90s, Newman wrote The Church of Scientology vs. The Net, which he describes as a “large web site documenting the ongoing battle between the Church of Scientology and the Net.”(1) Since this happened, Xenu.net’s Project Clambake was launched, and Anonymous from 4Chan has launched an all out attack on the Church of Scientology.

It is with the most pride that Mako tells me “Ron” is a local guy. He’s big in local bike stuff. He’s big into the local community. He’s a moderator of the Davis Square Livejournal community. The community, Mako says in his excited voice, is bigger than the Boston one. Standing at the fundraiser, wearing past the knee jean shorts and a “I Bike Somerville” t-shirt, Ron Newman doesn’t stand out at all. His hair is kind of curly and a little grey. He’s shorter than I am. But, when Mako talks about him, I can tell that he’s someone special. Whenever Mako tells me about anyone, I can tell they’re someone special.

When I first got here, I met a group of Mako’s friends at a local pub. At one point, towards the end of the evening, he explained that most of the table was, had been, or was in the process of becoming a maintainer of the Debian distribution of Linux. To someone, likely several someones, each of those people were kind of a big deal. Chris is a lead software engineer at One Laptop Per Child. In my world, OLPC is one of the biggest projects there is. To most people I know OLPC is not only important, but it’s a regular topic of conversation. It is the project name that carries the weight the same way names like Google and the New York Times carry weight. It isn’t just a matter of working for them, it’s a matter of being a “lead” for them. Being important to a big project or company is tantamount to being important.

Like Chris, Madeleine and Eric work for things that are important, or viewed as important. I tell a friend who is getting a Ph.D. in bioinformatics about their projects, to ask her what she thinks about them. She thinks it’s cool–the weight of the projects themselves pushes the people up a level from being normal to being special.

As I am introduced to each of these people, the thing that makes them special is announced. This person is a professor at MIT, this person is big in Scratch, this person makes a difference for the Free Software Foundation. It’s not just that they’re special, they’re important. Even when I’m introduced, it’s “[she's our] Resident. She’s writing a book,” as though it too is important and makes me special.(2)

When I first met Mako, it was before I actually met him in person. He was going to be a speaker at an event I was helping to organize. When I was told we were were going to try and get Mako that year, I preformed my usual test of learning about someone–I asked Steven.

“Hey, do you know this Benjamin Mako Hill guy?” I asked him.

This was in 2007. Honestly, I was an FLOSS groupie. I hung around with FLOSSies (FLOSSites? FLOSSers?). I organized events and did some low scale community stuff. I was hoping to get a job like my idol–something I awkwardly told her in an email one day–after I graduated. I wasn’t a disciple. I didn’t know about people or projects, really. I didn’t espouse ideologies or even really consider the arguments that people said around me. I accepted them as part of the noise of my world. They were secondary to the work. I liked the people, they were cool, we had things in common, and for some reason I didn’t understand, they seemed to like me.

I didn’t talk much about this. I tucked it away in my pocket like an open, dirty secret. My friends were patient with me and Steven regularly answered my questions about people before I began my ritual research about them–using the same dedication and methods I used for my classes.

Steven had the same reaction he’d had in the past and would have in the future–quiet acceptance and a muted surprise.

“How do you know these people?” He asked me. He seemed slightly jealous that time. Normally, he wasn’t. He told me a little bit about Benj. Mako Hill and may or may not have used the words “kind of a big deal.”

A few weeks after that, I was with another friend when I was reminded I needed to call Eric Raymond about something. I excused myself and make the call.

“Eric,” I said when he answered the phone. We exchanged a few words, I asked him if he’d be attending a pre-event dinner for guests. He said yes and I hung up.

The friend I was with stared.

“You just called ESR,” he said, amused, astounded, amazed. “And you did it like it was nothing!”

And for me it was.

When actual celebrities talk about other celebrities, they use a casual tone. They use first names. They make it clear that to them this is normal. They don’t do it to seem special, or to set their world apart, they to it because to them it’s just as normal as anyone’s life.

These people are FLOS celebrity. They’re celebrity by association. Their projects carry worth, and sometimes their names do. However, to someone who isn’t just their friends or their family, they’re important and interesting. They are celebrities created by the people who look up to them–personal celebrities who have power from real people rather than the media. People who have never, and may never, meet them follow what they say and do on the internet because of how they say it or what they do. But, they don’t view themselves this way. To them, they’re just another person, who has a job or a hobby. They might think their job is cool. They might think their job pays them too much. They might think they are working for something or someone important, but they themselves are not. To them, what they do and their friends are normal. To others, what they do and their friends are extraordinary.

(1) http://www.thecia.net/~rnewman/, last modified Fri 09 Aug 2002 02:28:14 PM EDT by (I assume) R. Newman.

(2) Neither of which are a reality as far as I’m concerned, but I’m getting to that point.

Steven, 01

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

From the 18th of May, 2010.

MJ: [W]ould it be okay if I said you use open source because you think it’s cool? I actually don’t know why you do at all. You should tell me sometime.
SD: It is cool. However, not in the high school meaning of cool.
MJ: In what way?
SD: Well, you run Ubuntu right?
MJ: Yes.
SD: Well, take any program you think is cool/useful/fun, [and] if you go to the terminal and type apt-get source program_name in a few seconds/minutes you will have the source of that program. All the cool exciting stuff it does is right there for you to play with, break, fix, improve. Think about the hours and hours of work that has gone into something like Firefox. Instead of jealously guarding the product of all that work, [the] people who make it have just given it to everyone. And not just part of it, but all of it.
MJ: And that is pretty cool.
SD: Something like that. I haven’t had Windows on my personal computer for four years or so. I’m not sure I could go back to a system that’s default was to hide things from me and keep things secret. If I find a good piece of free software for GNU/Linux, I can tell Will or someone else about it and not worry about breaking the law just for giving them a copy.
MJ: What is it the FSF says? The ability to distribute what we use?
SD: Redistribute. Redistribution is one of the “four freedoms” that the FSF talks about. Interestingly, I’ve increasingly found Freedom 0, the ability to run the program for any purpose, to be really important
MJ: Does it come up a lot?
SD: Since so often now, you buy software or other media and find that it is locked down such that it is illegal to run it on a different computer or device. This comes up not just software, but music and other media. People who buy music with DRM from the itunes store. The idea that somebody would want to buy something that can only be used on X numbers of computers and devices made by one company is astounding.
MJ: [Could it be] price [or] availability issues?
SD: Perhaps. Although, I just bought a DRM free copy of this Muse song from the Ubuntu Music Store, so that problem may be gone soon. [The Ubuntu Music Store]’s pretty good and has a decent selection. It is hard to say whether Apple is really being earnest in it’s “we want DRM free, but the labels won’t let us” message. I tend not to try to figure out what companies who are built around secrets are thinking. I mean, it is really easy to get around the DRM of itunes. The problem is, just because I can, doesn’t mean I want to break the law just to get access to something I own. I am still trying to figure out where I stand on certain edge issues such as online services
MJ: Explain?
SD: Well, so when you have software on your computer, it is more or less “your computing” that you are doing, but it is unclear what the boundaries of software freedom are when you are talking about web services because I am explicitly doing my computing on somebody else computer.
MJ: So the question is whether you can force a particular user philosophy on someone else’s computer or if it’s even ethical/legal to use certain things on systems not designed for them or stuff more like facebook, in the sense that they are laying down ownership of data?
SD: See, this is why I am still trying to figure out where I stand. There are a bunch of issues that get tied up together. There is the issue of (1) the software that you are using when you use the web service (i.e., you can’t download facebooks code.), but there is also the issue of (2) why I am handing over my data to some third party.

Wiki

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

“Let’s do this then,” Mako said.

And that was all it took.

We were sitting in a cafe. Mako was leaning against the end of the booth, half reading a paper. Chris was wandering back and forth from the table, listening to the house musician, a lone guitar player, and talking with us. Mika and Andres shared crepes. As they talked, Mika leaned forward to listen to him. Chris sat back down at the table and told me about his job. The conversation shifted and Mako put his reading down.

They started talking about Wikipedia. One of the problems with updating it, Mako saw, had to do with the nature of Wikipedia readers. You cannot update Wikipedia from a reader, or from offline, very easily. Mako suggested–possibly on the internet, he can’t remember–that it would be possible to make it so that people could suggest changes. They’d be able to make notes to themselves and have it automatically upload to the discussion page of the associated Wikipedia article once an internet connection could be established. Chris was concerned.

This thread of conversation sprawled out of a discussion–read: talk by Chris–on One Laptop Per Child. His concern over Mako’s suggestion was related to OLPC. “Many of the kids [who are part of the OLPC program] will never connect to the internet.” The ability to change articles, and contribute to the open nature of Wikipedia, would be outside of the experience of these children.

“We can have [the changes] stored,” Mako said. He went on to explain that these could be loaded onto a USB key that could be set up to update Wikipedia once an internet connection becomes available.

This was okay with Chris. He and Mako agreed to do it.

And that was all it took.